An assessment of cerebral venous thrombosis risk factors and associated clinical outcomes in Jazan region,Saudi Arabia

Objectives:To assess cerebral venous thrombosis risk factors, and associated clinical outcomes in Jazan region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Methods:This study is a retrospective review of the medical records of patients diagnosed with cerebral venous thrombosis and admitted to King Fahad Central Hospital in Jazan between 2010 and 2019. Data concerning socio-demographics, clinical features, risk factors, laboratory, and imaging investigations were retrieved. Furthermore, data about cases management, and outcomes, including death, were collected and analysed.Results:A total of 51 medical records were identified. The majority of the patients were females (68.6%), and the mean age of the patients was 33.3 years, of which three patients were under 18 years old. The most frequently recorded symptom was headache (76.5%), followed by seizure (45.1%). The most commonly recorded risk factor was protein S deficiency (57%), followed by anaemia (51%). Venous infarction and haemorrhage were the most common acute complications (13.7%). The majority of the patients had a favourable prognosis where only 27.5% recovered with disability and only one patient died due to the disease.Conclusion:Clinical presentation of cerebral venous thrombosis in Jazan region is similar to other local and international studies. However, anaemia was recorded as a main risk factor for the disease, which might require further investigation to assess the possible association between prevalence of anaemia in Jazan region and the incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis.

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare form of cerebrovascular disease in comparison with arterial stroke. CVT cases represent approximately 0.5-1% of all types of stroke which mainly occur in young and middle-aged adults.1 The data concerning the global epidemiology of CVT is currently limited.2 However, the incidence of CVT has been reported to vary between countries where the incidence might be higher as in Asian and the Middle Eastern countries in comparison to Australia and European countries.3According to a recent study conducted in Australia, the incidence of CVT was reported to reach 15.7 per 1,000,000 persons on a yearly basis. The incidence was higher among women and among those between 31-50 years old.4 In the Middle East, an Iranian study looked at the frequency of CVT between 2001 and 2004, and the annual frequency of CVT was 12.3 per one million.5 An older study, conducted in the city of Riyadh in Saudi Arabia between 1985 and 1994, identified 40 cases of CVT. Those identified were aged between 16 and 40.6 In addition, in a more recent study conducted in Jeddah and Al-Baha between 1990 and 2010, the number of detected cases of CVT was 111 where 19 of these were detected among children.7The CVT occurs when a thrombus develops as a result of a disturbance of the balance between the process of prothrombosis and thrombolysis.8,9 Risk factors for CVT can be categorised into transient and permanent risk factors. Permanent risk factors are hereditary thrombophilia, systemic diseases or miscellaneous factors, such as obesity. Transient risk factors can be subcategorised into sex-specific, iatrogenic, or miscellaneous risk factors, such as infection, head trauma or anaemia.8 The prevalence of CVT risk factors differs between countries. Infection, pregnancy, post-partum period, and dehydration have been reported to be more common in Asia and the Middle Eastern countries in comparison to European countries.8Patients with CVT exhibit variable clinical manifestations and complications, some of which can be life threatening. The most common clinical presentation is a headache, while some patients exhibit other signs and symptoms, such as seizure, decreased level of consciousness, vomiting, focal neurological deficit, or visual symptoms.8-10 Venous infarction and haemorrhage are frequently reported complications of CVT.11 Late presentation of CVT patients can increase the risk of disability and death. The mortality rate among CVT patients has been reported to vary between 4.3% and 6.8%.12Since CVT risk factors and vulnerable groups can vary between different populations, assessment of the distribution of risk factors among local populations can be clinically valuable. Studies assessing CVT prevalence and associated risk factors and clinical outcomes in Saudi populations are currently limited. Furthermore, data about CVT in Jazan region is currently lacking. This investigation aims to identify cases diagnosed with CVT in Jazan region and to evaluate the risk factors and associated clinical outcomes.     

Post-thrombolytic coagulopathy and complications in patients with pulmonary embolism treated with fixed-dose systemic alteplase

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - Alteplase treatment can cause a systemic coagulopathy although the incidence and contributory factors are unknown in pulmonary embolism (PE). Fixed-dosing...     

Timing of elective surgery and risk assessment after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an update

The impact of vaccination and new SARS-CoV-2 variants on peri-operative outcomes is unclear. We aimed to update previously published consensus recommendations on timing of elective surgery after SARS-CoV-2 infection to assist policymakers, administrative staff, clinicians and patients. The guidance remains that patients should avoid elective surgery within 7 weeks of infection, unless the benefits of doing so exceed the risk of waiting. We recommend individualised multidisciplinary risk assessment for patients requiring elective surgery within 7 weeks of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This should include baseline mortality risk calculation and assessment of risk modifiers (patient factors; SARS-CoV-2 infection; surgical factors). Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with previous variants increased peri-operative mortality risk three-fold throughout the 6 weeks after infection, and assumptions that asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection does not add risk are currently unfounded. Patients with persistent symptoms and those with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 may require a longer delay than 7 weeks. Elective surgery should not take place within 10 days of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, predominantly because the patient may be infectious, which is a risk to surgical pathways, staff and other patients. We now emphasise that timing of surgery should include the assessment of baseline and increased risk, optimising vaccination and functional status, and shared decision-making. While these recommendations focus on the omicron variant and current evidence, the principles may also be of relevance to future variants. As further data emerge, these recommendations may be revised.     

Future perspectives: Novel Frontiers in Cancer Metastasis

Clinical & Experimental Metastasis -